Archive for May, 2009
May
31
Potential Pitfalls of Sale and Rent Back
Posted by: | CommentsSale and Rent Back can assist home owners in financial difficulty to remain in their home.
Unfortunately the sale and rent back industry has grown rapidly and with unscrupulous investors jumping on the band wagon the industry has a poor reputation.
Many home buying companies are property traders not landlords. They believe there is no ethical way to offer a rent back option, so never look to develop a sell and rent back service. Many of them believe that their service offers many of the benefits claimed by sale and rent back without the risk and uncertainty.
What is Sale and Rent back?
You sell your home to a company with an agreement to rent it back for a period of time.
Potential Pitfalls:
Unfortunately the aims of many sale and rent back companies vary from those of the vendor and would be tenant. You should always seek independent advice but there are some common issues you should be aware of:
After initial rental period the rent is increased, often above market rent. You either pay the increase or move out
Company rents for limited timescale usually 6-12 months and then looks to sell the property. This is possible because you only have an assured shorthold tenancy or AST
Company goes bankrupt and your home is repossessed. You have limited rights and will end up being evicted
Company passes your property onto an investor. You don’t know who you are dealing with and may end with an unscrupulous landlord
Many companies are investors in disguise and may not be able to offer you a quick house sale. They are often small scale, with no proven track record and limited financial backing
A possible answer:
Other house buyers buy your property so that you can release equity and clear debt
You can then buy or rent an affordable home under standard terms
Basically you know where you stand and you have closure
Real Estate Professionals
May
25
Sell House Fast: Special Firms are There to Help
Posted by: | CommentsThere can be various reasons for your decision to sell your house fast. Financial difficulty can be the most obvious one. In any case, selling house through traditional means is often too slow a process for many people to feel comfortable with.
And suppose you are planning to shift to a different place, it generally happens that you would like your house to be sold off as to generate cash good enough to help you out with your plans. Apart from that, there can be other good reasons for you to want to go for a quick house sale. And often, you may want to sell house fast to get on with your plans faster. Lingering on for months altogether in the hope of potential buyers to take interest in your property and buying it out at a desirable price may be too long in the coming and too long to bear.
Selling house is as much a time-consuming affair that you imagine. If you can sell house fast through the quick sale scheme, it will help you as a homeowner to sell your property in standard time as much as selling it at an attractive price. And of course, looking at all the hassles of selling one’s property, it is no surprise that as confirmed by official surveys in the UK, house sales have increased by around 10 % since the last year.
Quick Sale is a scheme that fits the demand of the dynamic times. Economic decisions have to be taken fast and executed as per the time schedule of your plans. Indeed, with this scheme to serve your needs, you can set the time-frame as short as you like, ranging from a week to right down to a single day. There are many special agencies with an online presence who can help you to sell house fast in the given time frame, no matter where your residence may be in the UK. Just contact them and specify your requirements and their experienced professionals will take care of the rest.
Quick Property Sale
May
24
How to Find Good Mortgage Advice in a Difficult Market
Posted by: | CommentsSo what’s the real story? Does a crisis really exist? Clearly the mortgage industry is going through a serious “cleansing.” Lenders are closing their doors, Wall Street is treating mortgage backed securities like the plague, and borrowers are struggling to make loan payments.
If you listen to the TV folks you’ll be stirred into a bona fide panic. But is it a real crisis or is it a natural business cycle? I believe the answer is “no.”
Starting in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks the real estate and mortgage industry reaped the benefits of falling interest rates. And while many people in other industries suffered through tough economic times anyone in the mortgage business had the best years (financially) of their lives from 2002 – 2005.
And anytime there is money to be made there will be a flood of people looking to cash in – and the mortgage industry was no exception. People from all walks of life jumped in to become loan officers, processors, and managers as the industry reached higher levels than it could sustain long term.
According to Wholesale Data, the number of mortgage brokerages in 1997 was around 33,000 nationally. By 2005 it had ballooned to more than 55,000. Double the number doesn’t sound too bad – but the study shows the real problem: the market share of mortgage brokers was 64% in 1997 but had dropped to 58% by 2006. Twice the numbers of people were competing for a smaller percentage of loans.
The logical next step with so many people competing for smaller parts of the pie was for everyone to cut standards and rates to try and get what they can. Then came the advent of “easy money” with high loan to values, reducing credit restrictions and increased risk across the board. Again not good.
So is there a need to downsize the mortgage industry and regain control of guidelines and quality standards? Absolutely.
But what about this crisis - what are the facts?
Fact - Mortgage money is still readily available. The main difference is that credit qualification has really tightened up in an obvious reaction to the “easy credit” guidelines of the past few years. There are still options available for 100% financing, low down payment options and rates are still quite competitive.
Fact - Credit worthy borrowers are finally being rewarded. Lending had reached a point where any and all credit problems (including bankruptcy and foreclosure) were being brushed aside in favor of volume. These trends never made sense so when they backfire does that constitute a crisis? A borrower who pays their credit on time and saves money for reserves or down payment can still get a loan.
Fact - The downturn in real estate is a natural cycle. When you look at the big picture, the real estate industry went through a historic growth cycle created by historically low interest rates. This growth was fueled artificially by something that cannot be sustained so it shouldn’t be a surprise when the ride is over.
Fact - The mortgage industry needed to be downsized. Studies show that the number of mortgage professionals more than doubled since 1997. Anytime an industry sees such an influx of new people you can expect the sort of issues we’ve seen in our business:
lower levels of training and accountability
new players from other industries that don’t quite understand what they are in for
less emphasis on long term relationships
shrinking margins due to increased competition
lower levels of professional standards
Fact - Mortgage guidelines had reached a risk level never seen before in history. Some tightening of credit standards was inevitable.
Those in the sub-prime market have taken a beating over loose guidelines but the facts are that this issue was industry wide. Sub-prime in particular was never a “bad” thing if done at the right rate or loan to value. If credit or income standards were not up to conventional levels it makes sense that you should get a higher rate or lower loan to value than the conventional market. The problem comes when the non-standard rates and LTVs are just as competitive as conforming products – which is exactly where the market wound up by 2005.
And don’t think for a moment that conforming lenders weren’t pushing the limit. In order to keep up with competition guidelines loosened for them just as quickly as everyone else. The shutdown of conforming loan operations and the mortgage insurance losses we have seen over the last 18 months confirm this.
So with all of these trends the downsizing of the mortgage industry should be seen as a good thing. Those professionals staying in the mortgage business should be wiser and more professional than ever before. You can be sure that they want to stay in the business and fully realize what they are in for.
Industry changes bring new solutions
These sweeping changes in the industry have caused mortgage professionals to make some changes. Buckle up, change your ways or get out!
The industry changes inspired one mortgage broker to come up with a new service – offering mortgage advice for borrowers with loans in process for a small flat fee. The company, Trusted-Mortgage-Advice.com (www.trusted-mortgage-advice.com) offers to review a borrowers mortgage documents for the loan in process and help them negotiate the best terms with their lender. It’s a unique twist for a mortgage professional – no bait and switch, no “I can do better” – instead it’s that second opinion that most borrowers go to their friends for.
With so much uncertainty, so many changes, and so many “bad faith” stories out there I think there is a real need for borrowers to get independent, third party mortgage advice. So many times in the process borrowers call their friends or family to find out if they are getting a good deal – or if what the broker is telling them make sense. So going to another lender only assures they promise to beat your current deal. With Trusted-Mortgage-Advice.com (www.trusted-mortgage-advice.com) they will give you that second look to make sure you get the best deal possible.
Quick House Sale
May
24
How To Raise The Rent At Your Investment Property
Posted by: | CommentsBeing a landlord requires management skills, sales skills, and negotiation skills as you are constantly working with people (your tenants). One sensitive subject for both the landlord and tenant can be “How much is the rent going to be?” Once the tenant is living there, raising the rent is important but can be a delicate decision.
Keep in mind that you must keep your investment real estate business growing. To that end, you must keep your rents increasing at pace with the market and your rising costs. Raising the rent is simply part of managing your business smartly. Done correctly, it can be an easy and stress-free process.
Although every rental situation and each tenant/landlord relationship is different, I think raising the rent depends upon a couple items:
1. Is the tenant paying a fair market rent? If the rent is currently lower than market, it may be easy to raise it slightly as most tenants will realize they are getting a good deal where they are currently living. Plus they will not want to take on the added expense and time of moving.
2. When making your decision, ask yourself: “If the tenant decides to move because you are increasing the rent, can you re-rent the apartment for minimal cost and minimal or no vacant months?” If you increase the rent by $50 and the tenant decides to leave and you are left with a vacant $1200 per month apartment, was the increase worth it?
3. Consider that if you are increasing the rent in the spring, generally you can be more aggressive because it will be easier to re-rent that apartment in May than in December (at lease in colder climates).
4. If you are actively managing your lease renewals, you must be talking with the tenant 60-90 days prior to the lease renewal about their plans and any rent increases. This will give you time to re-rent the unit if the tenant chooses not not to renew.
5. Have the rent increase conversation with them verbally or in person. This will give you the opportunity to read their reaction to the increase. It is also more difficult for them to say no to your face.
6. If the tenant is hesitant about the increase, immediately see if they will accept the increase if you set the lease renewal to 18 months (locking their rent for that time) in exchange for the rent increase. This is actually an even better win for you as the landlord, as you have just locked them in as tenant for 6 extra months (and you got your rent increase).
7. When talking with your tenant, Use your best sales techniques to show them why they should both stay and accept the rent increase. At the end of the day, be honest. If the increase is related to increases in your costs, explain how your costs have changed. Most tenants can understand that taxes, insurance, or utilities do go up.
8. Lastly, if they are a great tenant consider simply leaving the rent at the same amount for another year. I would, however, let them know that you thought about a rent increase but “because they are such great tenants, you have decided to not change the rent for another year”. This will set up the idea in their minds that you did them a favor and will get them to expect a rent increase next year.
Having your rents keep pace with your expenses and market rents is an critical part of running investment real estate business. Although it can seem intimidating at first, if you just take your time and think through the process with each tenant, it can be a simple process when lease renewal time comes around.
Real Estate Professionals
May
22
Find the Solution Even With Financial Problems
Posted by: | CommentsIn many countries the purchase of a home funded by a mortgage is a common practice. But many people find it hard to take out such a loan, because of their prior problems, such as adverse credit history, County Court Judgements (CCJs), having mortgage arrears, being self employed, or having no proof of income. But these people too need a solution to get out of an overwhelming debt. Even though your credit history may not be spotless, or you may not be able to provide evidence of a guaranteed income, you should not lose hope. There is an answer for you, too. There are financial institutions that can help you make smaller payments on your mortgage by finding another lender wiling to offer you a better interest rate. These are also the institutions that will help you rule out the option of selling your home when you want to release the equity that you have built up. If you fit into any of the categories described as follows, then you can rest assured; there is hope for you.
You know you have your source of income, which may or may not be very reliable, yet you cannot provide any proof of your earnings. You can still take out a mortgage loan, which is typically referred to as Self Cert Mortgage. If you can afford to make payments, but you find it rather difficult to use a traditional method to demonstrate that these earnings exist, then you, as the borrower, can declare your earnings, and not have to come up with any proof of them, and be granted a self cert mortgage. The Self Cert CCJ mortgage fits in the same category, and although you may have found it quite difficult to get a remortgage having received a County Court Judgement against your name, you should know that there is a wide range of products available even for you. All it takes is that you contact specialists in Self Cert CCJ mortgage, and you will have your chance at securing a competitive loan, regardless of the reason that generated the County Court Judgement.
CCJ mortgage products are widely available, because even people with bad credit history need to become homeowners. CCJ mortgage Southampton is one of these products, and its features are similar to those of any other product in this category of loans, meaning that you will probably be able to get a mortgage or remortgage in spite of any County Court Judgements that you may have received. With the CCJ mortgage Southampton products, you need not worry about not finding lenders. These services are available to you, too.
Bad debt mortgage Southampton is yet another one of the financial products that you have at your disposal if you have had the misfortune to experience some adverse credit history. In most cases, banks and other financial institutions are reluctant in offering you any loans but there are other lenders that you can turn to when you have experienced bad debt mortgage Southampton.
Problems obtaining a mortgage or remortgage may also occur when you are self- employed and have received a CCJ against your name. However there is a financial product called Self Employed CCJ Mortgage that you can make use of. There are lenders willing to help you obtain a mortgage or remortgage even in this situation. You will have to talk to Self Employed CCJ Mortgage specialist who will make sure that your aspirations, circumstances and needs are entirely explored and then together with you they will provide you with the best solution.
One other financial product that can help you regain control over your finances is the Quick Arrears Remortgage. Having arrears should not be an impediment from getting a remortgage if you appeal to specialized companies who deal with problems like this every day. Quick Arrears Remortgage is also a good solution because it gives you the opportunity to manage finances through one payment a month. If you have had financial problems in your past, there are plenty offers for you as well and companies who can help you financially.
For more resources about Self Employed CCJ Mortgage or even about Quick Arrears Remortgage please review this page http://www.a2bhomeloans.co.uk
Quick Property Sale
May
22
Stealing the Home From Under You: the Growing Problem of Title Fraud
Posted by: | CommentsImagine this.
A Canadian homeowner - a successful professional with a lovely home in a nice neighbourhood - arrives home after work one day to find a “For Sale” sign on his lawn. Imagining that it may be a practical joke, he asks his wife if she’s unhappy with the house! But his wife has no idea why the sign is there, or who put it up. It turns out that the couple are the victims of title fraud - a crime that’s on a worrisome rise here in Canada.
How is it possible? While there are several variations on the crime, the basics are usually the same. The fraudster will target a home and falsify legal documents to create a convincing paper trail to “prove” their ownership of the home. They then proceed to mortgage the home and disappear with the money. Often, the rightful owners will have no idea what’s going on until a financial institution tracks them down to demand payments on a loan they never knew existed. In some cases, the fraudsters have actually stolen their identity: an especially difficult twist for the homeowner, who must also clear his/her name.
The easy access to electronic data — on both people and property — may be contributing to the rise in title fraud, which is costing homeowners and financial institutions millions of dollars each year. And though it’s a serious challenge to the lenders, it can be financially devastating to the homeowner.
Fortunately, Canadians have access to some protection against title fraud. A growing number of Canadian homeowners are purchasing “title insurance”: a product which offers some specific protections against title fraud and other potential pitfalls:
*A new survey shows a minor zoning violation that will require a variance - a process which will delay the close of the sale. Title insurance may allow the sale to close on time.
*Several months after moving in, a new owner discovers that the heating ducts were cut off in an amateur renovation, done without permits. Title insurance could cover the cost of the repair and related expenses.
*An older property has the lenders worried: though there’s no evidence of any problem, there is no survey for the property, and no record of permits for water or septic. Title insurance may provide lenders with the confidence to proceed with the mortgage.
Not surprising, title insurance is gaining support among both lenders and lawyers, who see the value of this kind of increased homeowner protection. Although some protection exists through your lawyer’s “errors and omissions” insurance - and the Land Registry has an assurance fund in place that may be helpful - homeowners have learned the hard way that accessing these monies can take time, legal hire, and money (potentially a lot) on their part.
On the other hand, title insurance - available at a modest, one-time cost - gives you immediate payout on a wide range of title problems. Best of all, title protection insurance is not limited to new purchasers only - it’s now available to current homeowners as well.
In case you’re wondering, the couple in the story above - which is based on one of the case files of Canada’s leading title insurance company - did eventually regain title to their house. But it’s a cautionary tale. Next time you talk to your broker or lender, ask about title insurance.
Rent Back Fast
May
22
Sales Advice For House Owners In Kilkenny
Posted by: | CommentsThis advice applies to the Republic Of Ireland only.
Steps involved after you have agreed a price for your house with the Buyer,
Appoint a Solicitor
Once you have agreed a price, you should seriously consider appointing a legal representative as early as possible. Solicitors need your agreement to find and secure your property’s Title Deeds if they are held by a bank or building society. The earlier this is done, the less chance of any delay in issuing Contracts at a later stage.
Take up Title Deeds
After they have received your written authority, the Solicitor will take up your Title Deeds from your Bank or Building Society. This takes about 14 days and at this stage your Solicitor will pay a scheduling fee to your Bank or Building Society on behalf of you, the seller.
Details Of Sale
The details of sale should be written once the price and conditions have been agreed by you and the booking deposit has been paid by the buyer. The details of sale contain basically what has been agreed by the buyer and seller, that is: the price, conditions of sale contents, buyer’s name and address, name of buyer’s solicitors and estimated closing date.
Contracts are Issued
After receiving the details of sale, your Solicitor will write the contracts and send them, together together with a copy of your Title Deeds to the Solicitors representing the buyers.
Contracts are Returned
If the Buyer’s Solicitor is satisfied after reading the Contracts, they will then advise the buyer to sign them and will then return same with a contract deposit to your Solicitor.
Signing of Contract
Now it’s the sellers turn to sign the contract and become legally bound to the sale. You sign the Contracts. Contracts are usually signed (in duplicate) in your solicitor’s office.
Exchange of Contracts
After the seller signs the Contracts, his/her Solicitor returns one copy to the Vendor’s Solicitor, thus completing the full exchange of Contracts and creating a binding agreement between both parties subject to terms and conditions set out in the Contract.
Requisitions.
The Purchaser’s Solicitor raises requisitions (general questions on the Title) and drafts the Purchase Deed. Both of these documents are sent to your Solicitor.
Replies to Requisitions
Your Solicitor replies to the questions raised above and returns any documentation required together with written replies and approves the draft Purchase Deed.
Redemption Figures
Your Solicitor obtains redemption figures being the amount required to redeem your existing loan calculated to the scheduled closing date (if any).
Deeds are Signed and Keys Transferred
The Transfer/Conveyance in the formal document which transfers your legal interest in your house to the Purchasers. It is signed by you together with other documentation in your Solicitor’s office. It is held on file until the closing date. You should also provide your Solicitor with a set of house keys and alarm code which will be handed over on completion of the sale
Closing Date
Your Solicitor agrees a closing date, on your instructions, with the Purchaser’s Solicitors.
Vaction Date
You should be ready to have your house fully emptied and left in a tidy fashion the day before or early on the completion date. You should also inform the Utility Companies (ESB, Bord Gais, Cablelink etc) of your scheduled move.
Close of Sale
The sale is completed by the Purchaser’s Solicitor attending at your Solicitor’s office and handing over the balance of the purchase monies in exchange for the Title Deeds
Redemption of Mortgage
Your Mortgage is paid off from the sale proceeds by your Solicitor
Transfer of Funds from Sale
Your Solicitor will account to you from the sale proceeds, if any, immediately following completion of sale and usually deducts the costs of sale from the balance.
This advice is provided as a resource to home sellers. It is a general guide only and the advice of a solicitor is almost always required before selling your home.
Sell House Quick
May
21
Your Home Insurance - How Occupants Affect Rates
Posted by: | CommentsOne of the very little talked about issues that affect home owners insurance coverage is the nature of occupants in the homes. Come to think of it, there are types of people who with their live style would certainly create more damage than others. It makes sense then for insurance companies to take note of these types of residents.
It would be necessary for you to know what insurance companies look out for when you apply for home insurance coverage.
You would certainly get low rates if the residents of your home consist of elders who likely are stay at home people. It is taking for granted that they are very less prone to activities that can result in damages. It is noted that due to their very limited goings out and in, they would add security to the house as would be burglars would prefer to operate at homes with no one at home at all.
If you have young children, their presence might not really affect the insurance coverage as they are not seen as being capable of enough damage to warrant the attention of the insurance company. This does not however include cases where you maybe constantly have a number of children in your home as in a daycare.
If however you have teenage high school or college students, be sure it would certainly be taken into consideration. Young people have a high energy level that looks for media of expression and in doing this, they are considered capable of significant high risk behavior. So be prepared to pay a higher premium to get adequate coverage for that home.
If you have pets in your home, you might not have to worry about this since most insurance companies don’t offer coverages that include damages caused by animals or pets. So it wouldn’t affect your premium.
This is by no means a conclusive list. It is merely a guide. It would do you a whole lot of good to take time to really compare several quotes from quote sites so you can have the best offer.
Get your quotes from reputable quote sites.
Passive Income
May
21
Why Would The Consulate Deny My Visa?
Posted by: | CommentsWhy Would the Consulate Deny My Visa?
www.cundyandmartin.com
There are many reasons under the immigration law that a person may be deemed “inadmissible” to the United States and therefore, a consulate would deny a visa. These reasons include health related grounds - including mental disorders and drug additions, crimal related grounds, security related grounds, foreign policy reasons, public charge reasons - ability for financial support, prior immigration violations, and fraud or misrepresentation.
Below is the language of the law, Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), detailing the grounds of “inadmissibility” - reasons a consulate would deny a visa.
———————————————–
INA Sec. 212(a)
See §309 IIRAIRA for effective date & transition provisions.
Classes of aliens ineligible for visas or admission.–Except as otherwise provided in this Act, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:
212(a)(1) Health-related grounds.–
212(a)(1)(A) In general.–Any alien–
212(a)(1)(A)(i) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to have a communicable disease of public health significance, which shall include infection with the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome,
212(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Effective “with respect to applications for immigrant visas or for adjustment of status filed after September 30, 1996.” IIRAIRA §341(c).
except as provided in subparagraph (C), who seeks admission as an immigrant, or who seeks adjustment of status to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and who has failed to present documentation of having received vaccination against vaccine-preventable diseases, which shall include at least the following diseases: mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, pertussis, influenza type B and hepatitis B, and any other vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices,
212(a)(1)(A)(iii) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the Attorney General)–
212(a)(1)(A)(iii)(I) to have a physical or mental disorder and behavior associated with the disorder that may pose, or has posed, a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others, or
212(a)(1)(A)(iii)(II) to have had a physical or mental disorder and a history of behavior associated with the disorder, which behavior has posed a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others and which behavior is likely to recur or to lead to other harmful behavior, or
212(a)(1)(A)(iv) who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to be a drug abuser or addict, is inadmissible.
212(a)(1)(B) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of certain clauses of subparagraph (A), see subsection (g).
212(a)(1)(C) Exception from immunization requirement for adopted children 10 years of age of younger.–Clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a child who —
212(a)(1)(C)(i) is 10 years of age or younger,
212(a)(1)(C)(ii) is described in section 101(b)(1)(F), and
212(a)(1)(C)(iii) is seeking an immigrant visa as an immediate relative under section 201(b),
if, prior to the admission of the child, an adoptive parent or prospective adoptive parent of the child, who has sponsored the child for admission as an immediate relative, has executed an affidavit stating that the parent is aware of the provisions of subparagraph (A)(ii) and will ensure that, within 30 days of the child’s admission, or at the earliest time that is medically appropriate, the child will receive the vaccinations identified in such subparagraph..
212(a)(2) Criminal and related grounds.–
212(a)(2)(A) Conviction of certain crimes.–
212(a)(2)(A)(i) In general.–Except as provided in clause (ii), any alien convicted of, or who admits having committed, or who admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of–
212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense) or an attempt or conspiracy to commit such a crime, or
212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(A)(ii) Exception.–Clause (i)(I) shall not apply to an alien who committed only one crime if–
212(a)(2)(A)(ii)(I) the crime was committed when the alien was under 18 years of age, and the crime was committed (and the alien released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than 5 years before the date of application for a visa or other documentation and the date of application for admission to the United States, or
212(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) the maximum penalty possible for the crime of which the alien was convicted (or which the alien admits having committed or of which the acts that the alien admits having committed constituted the essential elements) did not exceed imprisonment for one year and, if the alien was convicted of such crime, the alien was not sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of 6 months (regardless of the extent to which the sentence was ultimately executed).
212(a)(2)(B) Multiple criminal convictions.–Any alien convicted of 2 or more offenses (other than purely political offenses), regardless of whether the conviction was in a single trial or whether the offenses arose from a single scheme of misconduct and regardless of whether the offenses involved moral turpitude, for which the aggregate sentences to confinement
The term “actually imposed” was deleted after this word by IIRAIRA §322(a)(2)(B). Change applies to “convictions and sentences entered before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. Subparagraphs (B) and (C) of section 240(c)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as inserted by section 304(a)(3) of [IIRAIRA], shall apply to proving such convictions.”were 5 years or more is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(C) Controlled substance traffickers.–Any alien who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe–
212(a)(2)(C)(i) is or has been an illicit trafficker in any controlled substance or in any listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), or is or has been a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with others in the illicit trafficking in any such controlled or listed substance or chemical, or endeavored to do so; or
212(a)(2)(C)(ii) is the spouse, son, or daughter of an alien inadmissible under clause (i), has, within the previous 5 years, obtained any financial or other benefit from the illicit activity of that alien, and knew or reasonably should have known that the financial or other benefit was the product of such illicit activity, is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(D) Prostitution and commercialized vice.–Any alien who–
212(a)(2)(D)(i) is coming to the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in prostitution, or has engaged in prostitution within 10 years of the date of application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status,
212(a)(2)(D)(ii) directly or indirectly procures or attempts to procure, or (within 10 years of the date of application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status) procured or attempted to procure or to import, prostitutes or persons for the purpose of prostitution, or receives or (within such 10-year period) received, in whole or in part, the proceeds of prostitution, or
212(a)(2)(D)(iii) is coming to the United States to engage in any other unlawful commercialized vice, whether or not related to prostitution, is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(E) Certain aliens involved in serious criminal activity who have asserted immunity from prosecution.–Any alien–
212(a)(2)(E)(i) who has committed in the United States at any time a serious criminal offense (as defined in section 101(h)),
212(a)(2)(E)(ii) for whom immunity from criminal jurisdiction was exercised with respect to that offense,
212(a)(2)(E)(iii) who as a consequence of the offense and exercise of immunity has departed from the United States, and
212(a)(2)(E)(iv) who has not subsequently submitted fully to the jurisdiction of the court in the United States having jurisdiction with respect to that offense, is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(F) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of certain subparagraphs of this paragraph, see subsection (h).
212(a)(2)(G) Foreign government officials who have committed particularly severe violations of religious freedom.–Any alien who, while serving as a foreign government official, was responsible for or directly carried out, at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom, as defined in section 3 of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6402), is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(H) Significant traffickers in persons.–
212(a)(2)(H)(i) In general.–Any alien who is listed in a report submitted pursuant to section 111(b) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, or who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe is or has been a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with such a trafficker in severe forms of trafficking in persons, as defined in the section 103 of such Act, is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(H)(ii) Beneficiaries of trafficking.–Except as provided in clause (iii), any alien who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe is the spouse, son, or daughter of an alien inadmissible under clause (i), has, within the previous 5 years, obtained any financial or other benefit from the illicit activity of that alien, and knew or reasonably should have known that the financial or other benefit was the product of such illicit activity, is inadmissible.
212(a)(2)(H)(iii) Exception for certain sons and daughters.–Clause (ii) shall not apply to a son or daughter who was a child at the time he or she received the benefit described in such clause.
212(a)(2)(I) Money laundering.–Any alien–
212(a)(2)(I)(i) who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reason to believe, has engaged, is engaging, or seeks to enter the United States to engage, in an offense which is described in section 1956 or 1957 of title 18, United States Code (relating to laundering of monetary instruments); or
212(a)(2)(I)(ii) who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows is, or has been, a knowing aider, abettor, assister, conspirator, or colluder with others in an offense which is described in such section; is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)
See also §411(c) of USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, Retroactive Application of Amendments.
Security and related grounds.–
212(a)(3)(A) In general.–Any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in–
212(a)(3)(A)(i) any activity
212(a)(3)(A)(i)(I) to violate any law of the United States relating to espionage or sabotage or
212(a)(3)(A)(i)(II) to violate or evade any law prohibiting the export from the United States of goods, technology, or sensitive information,
212(a)(3)(A)(ii) any other unlawful activity, or
212(a)(3)(A)(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)(B)
See §411(c) of USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272, (10/26/01) for “Special Rule for Aliens in Exclusion or Deportation Proceedings.”
The amendments made by §103 of REAL ID Act, P.L. 109-13 (5/11/05) take effect on date of enactment. They and §212(a)(3)(B) shall apply to: (1) removal procedings instituted before, on, or after the date of enactment of this division; and (2) acts and conditions constituting a ground for inadmissibility, excludability, deportation, or removal occurring or existing before, on, or after such date.
Terrorist activities.–
212(a)(3)(B)(i) In general.–Any alien who–
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(I) has engaged in a terrorist activity,
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv)),
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(III)
See §342 of IIRAIRA, effective “on the date of the enactment of [IIRAIRA] and shall apply to incitement regardless of when it occurs.”
has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of–
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)(aa) a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)(bb) a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(V) is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi);
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI) is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VIII) has received military-type training (as defined in section 2339D(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code) from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or
212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IX) is the spouse or child of an alien who is inadmissible under this subparagraph, if the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible occurred within the last 5 years, is inadmissible. An alien who is an officer, official, representative, or spokesman of the Palestine Liberation Organization is considered, for purposes of this Act, to be engaged in a terrorist activity.
A literal reading of §103(a) of P.L. 109-13 (REAL ID Act) (5/11/05), which revised INA §212(a)(3)(B)(i), would put the words “is inadmissible” at the end of subclause (IX). However, placement at the beginning of the “outdented” paragraph resuming clause (B)(i) (as here), reflects the likely intention of Congress (and the position of the same words before the amendment).
212(a)(3)(B)(ii) Exception–Subclause (IX) of clause (i) does not apply to a spouse or child–
212(a)(3)(B)(ii)(I) who did not know or should not reasonably have known of the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible under this section; or
212(a)(3)(B)(ii)(II) whom the consular officer or Attorney General has reasonable grounds to believe has renounced the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible under this section.
212(a)(3)(B)(iii) “Terrorist activity” defined.–As used in this Act, the term “terrorist activity” means any activity which is unlawful under the laws of the place where it is committed (or which, if it had been committed in the United States, would be unlawful under the laws of the United States or any State) and which involves any of the following:
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I) The highjacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft, vessel, or vehicle).
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II) The seizing or detaining, and threatening to kill, injure, or continue to detain, another individual in order to compel a third person (including a governmental organization) to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the individual seized or detained.
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(III) A violent attack upon an internationally protected person (as defined in section 1116(b)(4) of title 18, United States Code) or upon the liberty of such a person.
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(IV) An assassination.
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V) The use of any–
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V)(a) biological agent, chemical agent, or nuclear weapon or device, or
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(V)(b) explosive, firearm, or other weapon or dangerous device (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.
212(a)(3)(B)(iii)(VI) A threat, attempt, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.
212(a)(3)(B)(iv) Engage in terrorist activity defined.–As used in this Act, the term “engage in terrorist activity” means, in an individual capacity or as a member of an organization–
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(I) to commit or to incite to commit, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily injury, a terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(II) to prepare or plan a terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(III) to gather information on potential targets for terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV) to solicit funds or other things of value for–
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV)(aa) a terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV)(bb) a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(I) or (vi)(II); or
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(IV)(cc) a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the solicitor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V) to solicit any individual–
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V)(aa) to engage in conduct otherwise described in this subsection;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V)(bb) for membership in a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(I) or (vi)(II); or
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(V)(cc) for membership in a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III) unless the solicitor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization; or
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) to commit an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit, false documentation or identification, weapons (including chemical, biological, or radiological weapons), explosives, or training–
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(aa) for the commission of a terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(bb) to any individual who the actor knows, or reasonably should know, has committed or plans to commit a terrorist activity;
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(cc) to a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi) or to any member of such an organization; or
212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI)(dd) to a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), or to any member of such an organization, unless the actor can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the actor did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization.
212(a)(3)(B)(v) Representative defined.–As used in this paragraph, the term “representative” includes an officer, official, or spokesman of an organization, and any person who directs, counsels, commands, or induces an organization or its members to engage in terrorist activity.
212(a)(3)(B)(vi)
See §411(c) of USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56 (10/26/01) for “Special Rule for Section 219 Organizations and Organizations Designated Under Section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(II).”
Terrorist organization defined.–As used in this section, the term ‘terrorist organization’ means an organization–
212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(I) designated under section 219;
212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(II) otherwise designated, upon publication in the Federal Register, by the Secretary of State in consultation with or upon the request of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as a terrorist organization, after finding that the organization engages in the activities described in subclauses (I) through (VI) of clause (iv); or
212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) that is a group of two or more individuals, whether organized or not, which engages in, or has a subgroup which engages in, the activities described in subclauses (I) through (VI) of clause (iv).
212(a)(3)(C) Foreign policy.–
212(a)(3)(C)(i) In general.–An alien whose entry or proposed activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)(C)(ii) Exception for officials.–An alien who is an official of a foreign government or a purported government, or who is a candidate for election to a foreign government office during the period immediately preceding the election for that office, shall not be excludable or subject to restrictions or conditions on entry into the United States under clause (i) solely because of the alien’s past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations, if such beliefs, statements, or associations would be lawful within the United States.
212(a)(3)(C)(iii) Exception for other aliens.–An alien, not described in clause (ii), shall not be excludable or subject to restrictions or conditions on entry into the United States under clause (i) because of the alien’s past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations, if such beliefs, statements, or associations would be lawful within the United States, unless the Secretary of State personally determines that the alien’s admission would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.
212(a)(3)(C)(iv) Notification of determinations.–If a determination is made under clause (iii) with respect to an alien, the Secretary of State must notify on a timely basis the chairmen of the Committees on the Judiciary and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and of the Committees on the Judiciary and Foreign Relations of the Senate of the identity of the alien and the reasons for the determination.
212(a)(3)(D) Immigrant membership in totalitarian party.–
212(a)(3)(D)(i) In general.–Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)(D)(ii) Exception for involuntary membership.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien because of membership or affiliation if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer when applying for a visa (or to the satisfaction of the Attorney General when applying for admission) that the membership or affiliation is or was involuntary, or is or was solely when under 16 years of age, by operation of law, or for purposes of obtaining employment, food rations, or other essentials of living and whether necessary for such purposes.
212(a)(3)(D)(iii) Exception for past membership.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien because of membership or affiliation if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer when applying for a visa (or to the satisfaction of the Attorney General when applying for admission) that–
212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(I) the membership or affiliation terminated at least–
212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(I)(a) 2 years before the date of such application, or
212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(I)(b) 5 years before the date of such application, in the case of an alien whose membership or affiliation was with the party controlling the government of a foreign state that is a totalitarian dictatorship as of such date, and
212(a)(3)(D)(iii)(II) the alien is not a threat to the security of the United States.
212(a)(3)(D)(iv) Exception for close family members.–The Attorney General may, in the Attorney General’s discretion, waive the application of clause (i) in the case of an immigrant who is the parent, spouse, son, daughter, brother, or sister of a citizen of the United States or a spouse, son, or daughter of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest if the immigrant is not a threat to the security of the United States.
212(a)(3)(E)
Changes to INA §212(a)(3)(E) effected by §5501 of P.L. 108-458 (12/17/04) applicable to “offenses committed before, on, or after” 12/17/04.
Participants in Nazi persecution, genocide, or the commission of any act of torture or extrajudicial killing.–
212(a)(3)(E)(i) Participation in Nazi persecutions.–Any alien who, during the period beginning on March 23, 1933, and ending on May 8, 1945, under the direction of, or in association with–
212(a)(3)(E)(i)(I) the Nazi government of Germany,
212(a)(3)(E)(i)(II) any government in any area occupied by the military forces of the Nazi government of Germany,
212(a)(3)(E)(i)(III) any government established with the assistance or cooperation of the Nazi government of Germany, or
212(a)(3)(E)(i)(IV) any government which was an ally of the Nazi government of Germany, ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)(E)(ii) Participation in genocide.–Any alien who ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in conduct outside the United States that would, if committed in the United States or by a United States national, be genocide, as defined in section 1091(a) of title 18, United States Code, is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)(E)(iii) Commission of acts of torture or extrajudicial killings.–Any alien who, outside the United States, has committed, ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the commission of–
212(a)(3)(E)(iii)(I) any act of torture, as defined in section 2340 of title 18, United States Code; or
212(a)(3)(E)(iii)(II) under color of law of any foreign nation, any extrajudicial killing, as defined in section 3(a) of the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 (28 U.S.C. 1350 note),
is inadmissible.
212(a)(3)(F) Association with terrorist organizations.–Any alien who the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Attorney General, or the Attorney General, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines has been associated with a terrorist organization and intends while in the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in activities that could endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States is inadmissible.
212(a)(4)
See §423(d) of the USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, for provisions relating to immigration benefits for the victims of terrorism.
Public charge.–
212(a)(4)(A)
Section 308(d)(1)(C) of IIRAIRA changes the term “is excludable” to “is inadmissible”. Section 531 of IIRAIRA rewrites the entire paragraph using the term “is excludable”. The Office of the Law Revision Counsel, which prepares and published the U.S. Code, uses “is inadmissible.”
The amendments made by §531 of IIRAIRA “shall apply to applications submitted on or after such date, not earlier than 30 days and not later than 60 days after the date the Attorney General promulgates under section 551(c)(2) of [IIRAIRA] a standard form for an affidavit of support, as the Attorney General shall specify, but subparagraphs (C) and (D) of section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as so amended, shall not apply to applications with respect to which an official interview with an immigration officer was conducted before such effective date.”
In general.–Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.
212(a)(4)(B) Factors to be taken into account.–
212(a)(4)(B)(i) In determining whether an alien is excludable under this paragraph, the consular officer or the Attorney General shall at a minimum consider the alien’s–
212(a)(4)(B)(i)(I) age;
212(a)(4)(B)(i)(II) health;
212(a)(4)(B)(i)(III) family status;
212(a)(4)(B)(i)(IV) assets, resources, and financial status; and
212(a)(4)(B)(i)(V) education and skills.
212(a)(4)(B)(ii) In addition to the factors under clause (i), the consular officer or the Attorney General may also consider any affidavit of support under section 213A for purposes of exclusion under this paragraph.
212(a)(4)(C) Family-sponsored immigrants.–Any alien who seeks admission or adjustment of status under a visa number issued under section 201(b)(2) or 203(a) is excludable under this paragraph unless–
212(a)(4)(C)(i) the alien has obtained–
212(a)(4)(C)(i)(I) status as a spouse or a child of a United States citizen pursuant to clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of section 204(a)(1)(A), or
212(a)(4)(C)(i)(II) classification pursuant to clause (ii) or (iii) of section 204(a)(1)(B);
212(a)(4)(C)(i)(III) classification or status as a VAWA self-petitioner; or
212(a)(4)(C)(ii) the person petitioning for the alien’s admission (and any additional sponsor required under section 213A(f) or any alternative sponsor permitted under paragraph (5)(B) of such section) has executed an affidavit of support described in section 213A with respect to such alien.
212(a)(4)(D) Certain employment-based immigrants.–Any alien who seeks admission or adjustment of status under a visa number issued under section 203(b) by virtue of a classification petition filed by a relative of the alien (or by an entity in which such relative has a significant ownership interest) is excludable under this paragraph unless such relative has executed an affidavit of support described in section 213A with respect to such alien.
212(a)(5)
For special provisions for citizens of Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) & of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), notwithstanding INA §212(a)(5), see Compacts between the U.S. and those two governments (Art. IV in each respective Compact), as approved in the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003, P.L. 108-188 (12/17/03), §§201(a) [FSM] & (b) [RMI]. See also §104(b) of that Act.
Labor certification and qualifications for certain immigrants.–
212(a)(5)(A) Labor certification.–
212(a)(5)(A)(i) In general.–Any alien who seeks to enter the United States for the purpose of performing skilled or unskilled labor is inadmissible, unless the Secretary of Labor has determined and certified to the Secretary of State and the Attorney General that–
212(a)(5)(A)(i)(I) there are not sufficient workers who are able, willing, qualified (or equally qualified in the case of an alien described in clause (ii)) and available at the time of application for a visa and admission to the United States and at the place where the alien is to perform such skilled or unskilled labor, and
212(a)(5)(A)(i)(II) the employment of such alien will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of workers in the United States similarly employed.
212(a)(5)(A)(ii) Certain aliens subject to special rule.–For purposes of clause (i)(I), an alien described in this clause is an alien who–
212(a)(5)(A)(ii)(I) is a member of the teaching profession, or
212(a)(5)(A)(ii)(II) has exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts.
212(a)(5)(A)(iii) Professional athletes.–
212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(I) In general.–A certification made under clause (i) with respect to a professional athlete shall remain valid with respect to the athlete after the athlete changes employer, if the new employer is a team in the same sport as the team which employed the athlete when the athlete first applied for certification.
212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(II) Definition.–For purposes of subclause (I), the term “professional athlete” means an individual who is employed as an athlete by–
212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(II)(aa) a team that is a member of an association of 6 or more professional sports teams whose total combined revenues exceed $10,000,000 per year, if the association governs the conduct of its members and regulates the contests and exhibitions in which its member teams regularly engage; or
212(a)(5)(A)(iii)(II)(bb) any minor league team that is affiliated with such an association.
212(a)(5)(A)(iv) Long delayed adjustment applicants–A certification made under clause (i) with respect to an individual whose petition is covered by section 204(j) shall remain valid with respect to a new job accepted by the individual after the individual changes jobs or employers if the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the certification was issued.
212(a)(5)(B) Unqualified physicians.–An alien who is a graduate of a medical school not accredited by a body or bodies approved for the purpose by the Secretary of Education (regardless of whether such school of medicine is in the United States) and who is coming to the United States principally to perform services as a member of the medical profession is inadmissible, unless the alien
212(a)(5)(B)(i) has passed parts I and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners Examination (or an equivalent examination as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) and
212(a)(5)(B)(ii) is competent in oral and written English. For purposes of the previous sentence, an alien who is a graduate of a medical school shall be considered to have passed parts I and II of the National Board of Medical Examiners if the alien was fully and permanently licensed to practice medicine in a State on January 9, 1978, and was practicing medicine in a State on that date.
212(a)(5)(C) Uncertified foreign health-care workers.–Subject to subsection (r), any alien who seeks to enter the United States for the purpose of performing labor as a health-care worker, other than a physician, is excludable unless the alien presents to the consular officer, or, in the case of an adjustment of status, the Attorney General, a certificate from the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools, or a certificate from an equivalent independent credentialing organization approved by the Attorney General in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, verifying that–
212(a)(5)(C)(i) the alien’s education, training, license, and experience–
212(a)(5)(C)(i)(I) meet all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for entry into the United States under the classification specified in the application;
212(a)(5)(C)(i)(II) are comparable with that required for an American health-care worker of the same type; and
212(a)(5)(C)(i)(III) are authentic and, in the case of a license, unencumbered;
212(a)(5)(C)(ii) the alien has the level of competence in oral and written English considered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, to be appropriate for health care work of the kind in which the alien will be engaged, as shown by an appropriate score on one or more nationally recognized, commercially available, standardized assessments of the applicant’s ability to speak and write; and
212(a)(5)(C)(iii) if a majority of States licensing the profession in which the alien intends to work recognize a test predicting the success on the profession’s licensing or certification examination, the alien has passed such a test, or has passed such an examination.
For purposes of clause (ii), determination of the standardized tests required and of the minimum scores that are appropriate are within the sole discretion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and are not subject to further administrative or judicial review.
212(a)(5)(D) Application of grounds.–The grounds for inadmissibility of aliens under subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall apply to immigrants seeking admission or adjustment of status under paragraph (2) or (3) of section 203(b).
212(a)(6) Illegal entrants and immigration violators.–
212(a)(6)(A) Eff date
Section 301(c)(2) of IIRAIRA provides: “Transition for battered spouse or child provision.–The requirements of subclauses (II) and (III) of section 212(a)(6)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as inserted by paragraph (1), shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that the alien first arrived in the United States before the title III-A effective date (described in section 309(a)).” See §309 IIRAIRA for “title III-A” effective date provisions.
Aliens present without admission or parole.–
212(a)(6)(A)(i) In general.–An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, or who arrives in the United States at any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General, is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(A)(ii) Exception for certain battered women and children.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that–
212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(I) the alien is a VAWA self-petitioner;
212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)
212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)(a) the alien has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent, or by a member of the spouse’s or parent’s family residing in the same household as the alien and the spouse or parent consented or acquiesced to such battery or cruelty, or
212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)(b) the alien’s child has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a spouse or parent of the alien (without the active participation of the alien in the battery or cruelty) or by a member of the spouse’s or parent’s family residing in the same household as the alien when the spouse or parent consented to or acquiesced in such battery or cruelty and the alien did not actively participate in such battery or cruelty, and
212(a)(6)(A)(ii)(III) there was a substantial connection between the battery or cruelty described in subclause (I) or (II) and the alien’s unlawful entry into the United States.
212(a)(6)(B) Failure to attend removal proceeding.–Any alien who without reasonable cause fails or refuses to attend or remain in attendance at a proceeding to determine the alien’s inadmissibility or deportability and who seeks admission to the United States within 5 years of such alien’s subsequent departure or removal is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(C) Misrepresentation.–
212(a)(6)(C)(i) In general.–Any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other benefit provided under this Act is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(C)(ii) Falsely claiming citizenship.– Ed note
This provision was added by §344(a) of IIRAIRA and applies only to representations made on or after the date of enactment (Sept. 30, 1996). Amended by Sec. 201(b)(2), title II, Child Citizenship Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-395, Act of Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1631; effective date: Sec. 201(b)(3) of such title II of such Act provided in pertinent part that “The amendment made by [Sec. 201(b)(2)] shall be effective as if included in the enactment of section 344 of the IIRAIRA of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-208).
212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) In general.–Any alien who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself or herself to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this Act (including section 274A) or any other Federal or State law is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(II) Exception–In the case of an alien making a representation described in subclause (I), if each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of making such representation that he or she was a citizen, the alien shall not be considered to be inadmissible under any provision of this subsection based on such representation.
212(a)(6)(C)(iii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (i).
212(a)(6)(D) Stowaways.–Any alien who is a stowaway is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(E) Smugglers.–
212(a)(6)(E)(i) In general.–Any alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(E)(ii) Special rule in the case of family reunification.–Clause (i) shall not apply in the case of alien who is an eligible immigrant (as defined in section 301(b)(1) of the Immigration Act of 1990), was physically present in the United States on May 5, 1988, and is seeking admission as an immediate relative or under section 203(a)(2) (including under section 112 of the Immigration Act of 1990) or benefits under section 301(a) of the Immigration Act of 1990 if the alien, before May 5, 1988, has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided only the alien’s spouse, parent, son, or daughter (and no other individual) to enter the United States in violation of law.
212(a)(6)(E)(iii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (d)(11).
212(a)(6)(F) Subject of civil penalty.–
212(a)(6)(F)(i) In general.–An alien who is the subject of a final order for violation of section 274C is inadmissible.
212(a)(6)(F)(ii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (d)(12).
212(a)(6)(G) Eff date
See §346 of IIRAIRA, effective for “aliens who obtain the status of a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F) of the [INA] after the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of enactment of [IIRAIRA], including aliens whose status as such a nonimmigrant is extended after the end of such period.”
Student visa abusers.–An alien who obtains the status of a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(F)(i) and who violates a term or condition of such status under section 214(l) Reference is most likey to the §214(l) that was redesignated §214(m) by Pub. L. 106-386. is excludable until the alien has been outside the United States for a continuous period of 5 years after the date of the violation.
212(a)(7) Documentation requirements.–
212(a)(7)(A) Immigrants.–
212(a)(7)(A)(i) In general.–Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act, any immigrant at the time of application for admission–
212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) who is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document required by this Act, and a valid unexpired passport, or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality if such document is required under the regulations issued by the Attorney General under section 211(a), or
212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II) whose visa has been issued without compliance with the provisions of section 203, is inadmissible.
212(a)(7)(A)(ii) Waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (k).
212(a)(7)(B) Nonimmigrants.–
212(a)(7)(B)(i) In general.– Any nonimmigrant who–
212(a)(7)(B)(i)(I) is not in possession of a passport valid for a minimum of six months from the date of the expiration of the initial period of the alien’s admission or contemplated initial period of stay authorizing the alien to return to the country from which the alien came or to proceed to and enter some other country during such period, or
212(a)(7)(B)(i)(II) Ed note
For special provisions for citizens of Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), notwithstanding INA §212(a)(7)(b)(i)(II), see Compacts between the U.S. and those two governments (Art. IV in each respective Compact), as approved in the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003, P.L. 108-188 (12/17/03), §§201(a) [FSM] and (b) [RMI]. See also §104(b) of that Act.
is not in possession of a valid nonimmigrant visa or border crossing identification card at the time of application for admission,
is inadmissible.
212(a)(7)(B)(ii) General waiver authorized.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i), see subsection (d)(4).
212(a)(7)(B)(iii) Guam visa waiver.–For provision authorizing waiver of clause (i) in the case of visitors to Guam, see subsection (l).
212(a)(7)(B)(iv) Visa waiver program.–For authority to waive the requirement of clause (i) under a program, see section 217.
212(a)(8) Ineligible for citizenship.–
212(a)(8)(A) In general.–Any immigrant who is permanently ineligible to citizenship is inadmissible.
212(a)(8)(B) Draft evaders.–Any person who has departed from or who has remained outside the United States to avoid or evade training or service in the armed forces in time of war or a period declared by the President to be a national emergency is inadmissible, except that this subparagraph shall not apply to an alien who at the time of such departure was a nonimmigrant and who is seeking to reenter the United States as a nonimmigrant.
212(a)(9) Aliens previously removed.–
212(a)(9)(A) Certain aliens previously removed.–
212(a)(9)(A)(i) Arriving aliens.–Any alien who has been ordered removed under section 235(b)(1) or at the end of proceedings under section 240 initiated upon the alien’s arrival in the United States and who again seeks admission within 5 years of the date of such removal (or within 20 years in the case of a second or subsequent removal or at any time in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony) is inadmissible.
212(a)(9)(A)(ii) Other aliens.–Any alien not described in clause (i) who–
212(a)(9)(A)(ii)(I) has been ordered removed under section 240 or any other provision of law, or
212(a)(9)(A)(ii)(II) departed the United States while an order of removal was outstanding, and who seeks admission within 10 years of the date of such alien’s departure or removal (or within 20 years of such date in the case of a second or subsequent removal or at any time in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony) is inadmissible.
212(a)(9)(A)(iii) Exception.–Clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply to an alien seeking admission within a period if, prior to the date of the alien’s reembarkation at a place outside the United States or attempt to be admitted from foreign contiguous territory, the Attorney General has consented to the alien’s reapplying for admission.
212(a)(9)(B)
Section 301(b)(3) of IIRAIRA provides: “In applying section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as inserted by paragraph (1), no period before the title III-A effective date shall be included in a period of unlawful presence in the United States.” See IIRAIRA §309 for title III-A effective date provisions.
Aliens unlawfully present.–
212(a)(9)(B)(i) In general.–Any alien (other than an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence) who–
212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) was unlawfully present in the United States for a period of more than 180 days but less than 1 year, voluntarily departed the United States (whether or not pursuant to section 244(e) [sic]
Sic. Probably should be §240B.
) prior to the commencement of proceedings under section 235(b)(1) or section 240, and again seeks admission within 3 years of the date of such alien’s departure or removal, or
212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) has been unlawfully present in the United States for one year or more, and who again seeks admission within 10 years of the date of such alien’s departure or removal from the United States, is inadmissible.
212(a)(9)(B)(ii) Construction of unlawful presence.–For purposes of this paragraph, an alien is deemed to be unlawfully present in the United States if the alien is present in the United States after the expiration of the period of stay authorized by the Attorney General or is present in the United States without being admitted or paroled.
212(a)(9)(B)(iii) Exceptions.–
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(I) Minors.–No period of time in which an alien is under 18 years of age shall be taken into account in determining the period of unlawful presence in the United States under clause (i).
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(II) Asylees.–No period of time in which an alien has a bona fide application for asylum pending under section 208 shall be taken into account in determining the period of unlawful presence in the United States under clause (i) unless the alien during such period was employed without authorization in the United States.
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(III) Family unity.–No period of time in which the alien is a beneficiary of family unity protection pursuant to section 301 of the Immigration Act of 1990 shall be taken into account in determining the period of unlawful presence in the United States under clause (i).
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(IV) Battered women and children.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who would be described in paragraph (6)(A)(ii) if “violation of the terms of the alien’s nonimmigrant visa” were substituted for “unlawful entry into the United States” in subclause (III) of that paragraph.
212(a)(9)(B)(iii)(V) Victims of a severe form of trafficking in persons–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien who demonstrates that the severe form of trafficking (as that term is defined in section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102)) was at least one central reason for the alien’s unlawful presence in the United States.
212(a)(9)(B)(iv) Tolling for good cause.– In the case of an alien who–
212(a)(9)(B)(iv)(I) has been lawfully admitted or paroled into the United States,
212(a)(9)(B)(iv)(II) has filed a nonfrivolous application for a change or extension of status before the date of expiration of the period of stay authorized by the Attorney General, and
212(a)(9)(B)(iv)(III) has not been employed without authorization in the United States before or during the pendency of such application, the calculation of the period of time specified in clause (i)(I) shall be tolled during the pendency of such application, but not to exceed 120 days.
212(a)(9)(B)(v) Waiver.–The Attorney General has sole discretion to waive clause (i) in the case of an immigrant who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen or of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, if it is established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the refusal of admission to such immigrant alien would result in extreme hardship to the citizen or lawfully resident spouse or parent of such alien. No court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision or action by the Attorney General regarding a waiver under this clause.
212(a)(9)(C) Aliens unlawfully present after previous immigration violations.–
212(a)(9)(C)(i) In general.– Any alien who–
212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) has been unlawfully present in the United States for an aggregate period of more than 1 year, or
212(a)(9)(C)(i)(II) has been ordered removed under section 235(b)(1), section 240, or any other provision of law, and who enters or attempts to reenter the United States without being admitted is inadmissible.
212(a)(9)(C)(ii) Exception.–Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien seeking admission more than 10 years after the date of the alien’s last departure from the United States if, prior to the alien’s reembarkation at a place outside the United States or attempt to be readmitted from a foreign contiguous territory, the Secretary of Homeland Security has consented to the alien’s reapplying for admission.
212(a)(9)(C)(iii) Waiver.–The Secretary of Homeland Security may waive the application of clause (i) in the case of an alien who is a VAWA self-petitioner if there is a connection between–
212(a)(9)(C)(iii)(I) the alien’s battering or subjection to extreme cruelty; and
212(a)(9)(C)(iii)(II) the alien’s removal, departure from the United States, reentry or reentries into the United States; or attempted reentry into the United States.
212(a)(10) Miscellaneous.–
212(a)(10)(A) Practicing polygamists.–Any immigrant who is coming to the United States to practice polygamy is inadmissible.
212(a)(10)(B) Guardian required to accompany helpless alien.–Any alien–
212(a)(10)(B)(i) who is accompanying another alien who is inadmissible and who is certified to be helpless from sickness, mental or physical disability, or infancy pursuant to section 232(c), and
212(a)(10)(B)(ii) whose protection or guardianship is determined to be required by the alien described in clause (i),
is inadmissible.
212(a)(10)(C) International child abduction.–
212(a)(10)(C)(i) In general.–Except as provided in clause (ii), any alien who, after entry of an order by a court in the United States granting custody to a person of a United States citizen child who detains or retains the child, or withholds custody of the child, outside the United States from the person granted custody by that order, is inadmissible until the child is surrendered to the person granted custody by that order.
212(a)(10)(C)(ii) Aliens supporting abductors and relatives of abductors. –Any alien who–
212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(I) is known by the Secretary of State to have intentionally assisted an alien in the conduct described in clause (i),
212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(II) is known by the Secretary of State to be intentionally providing material support or safe haven to an alien described in clause (i), or
212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(III) Ed note
Subclause 212(a)(10)(C)(ii)(III), reprinted here as in the original legislation (P.L. 105-277, §2226), most probably should be read as if it ended after the comma after the words “unreviewable discretion,” with the remaining text (beginning with “is inadmissible”) outdented and applicable to all of clause (10)(C)(ii). Note that the subclause could also be read (albeit less plausibly) as if it ended after the first reference to “clause (i),” making the phrase referring to the Secretary’s unreviewable discretion also applicable to all of clause (10)(C)(ii)
is a spouse (other than the spouse who is the parent of the abducted child), child (other than the abducted child), parent, sibling, or agent of an alien described in clause (i), if such person has been designated by the Secretary of State at the Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion, is inadmissible until the child described in clause (i) is surrendered to the person granted custody by the order described in that clause, and such person and child are permitted to return to the United States or such person’s place of residence.
212(a)(10)(C)(iii) Exceptions.–Clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply–
212(a)(10)(C)(iii)(I) to a government official of the United States who is acting within the scope of his or her official duties;
212(a)(10)(C)(iii)(II) to a government official of any foreign government if the official has been designated by the Secretary of State at the Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion; or
212(a)(10)(C)(iii)(III) so long as the child is located in a foreign state that is a party to the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at The Hague on October 25, 1980.
212(a)(10)(D) Unlawful voters.–
212(a)(10)(D)(i) In General.–Any alien who has voted in violation of any Federal, State, or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, or regulation is inadmissible.
212(a)(10)(D)(ii) Exception.–In the case of an alien who voted in a Federal, State, or local election (including an initiative, recall, or referendum) in violation of a lawful restriction of voting to citizens, if each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of such violation that he or she was a citizen, the alien shall not be considered to be inadmissible under any provision of this subsection based on such violation.
212(a)(10)(E)
Added by §352 of HR 2202, effective for “individuals who renounce United States citizenship on and after the date of the enactment of [HR 2202].
Former citizens who renounced citizenship to avoid taxation.–Any alien who is a former citizen of the United States who officially renounces United States citizenship and who is determined by the Attorney General to have renounced United States citizenship for the purpose of avoiding taxation by the United States is excludable.
Minnesota Immigration Lawyers
www.cundyandmartin.com
Sell and Rent Back
May
17
Juvenile Records not Always Private Records
Posted by: | CommentsMany people believe that juvenile offenses are not serious and that they are extinguished or sealed when a juvenile reaches the age of 18. Unfortunately, that is not correct. A juvenile record can be long lasting and it can have a significant impact on a juvenile’s ability to find employment or rent apartments as an adult.
Certification as an Adult.
Some juvenile records are certified to adult court automatically by operation of law. For example, any first degree murder conviction is certified to adult court.
Certification to adult court may also occur based on a motion from the prosecution. Juveniles over the age of 13 can be certified into adult court when the prosecutor files a motion for adult certification in a felony case. That is often the case in matters involving criminal sexual conduct, assault or murder. Having experienced counsel to combat that certification can mean the difference between an indefinite criminal record and a record that is sealed to the public or only partially accessible.
A DWI case is also treated as an adult criminal offense if the juvenile is age 16 or 17 and charged with another misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor traffic violation simultaneously.
Traffic offenses for juveniles ages 16 or 17 are also under adult court jurisdiction pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec. 2560B.163, Subd. 1.
Predator/Sex Offenses Require Public Registration
Any court order requiring registration of a juvenile ages 16 or 17 as a sexual offender is a public record. If the juvenile is considered a level 3 sexual offender, the registration record is also public. So too is a juvenile order certifying a juvenile as an adult and convicted of a requisite felony.
Public Hearings in Juvenile Court
Although juvenile hearings are often private, some proceedings are open to the public. Specifically, proceedings are open to the public for any 16 or 17 year old charged with a felony offense or in any case where the court has extended juvenile jurisdiction (EJJ). Motions may be filed by parties or on the court’s own motion for some proceedings to remain private. Having experienced counsel to shield a juvenile charged with a felony from public scrutiny can be an important consideration in any juvenile case.
Public Records in Juvenile Court
Juvenile records may become public records if a juvenile is 16 years or older and charged with an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult. This is codified under Minnesota Statutes Sec. 260B.171. Interestingly enough, parents are often deceived when felony charges are reduced or dismissed. If the original charge would have been a felony for an adult, any plea to a reduced charge or a dismissal would remain a public record.
Juvenile Records Accessible to Agencies and Law Enforcement
Often parents believe that a juvenile record will not affect their children once they reach adulthood. However, under Minnesota Statutes Sec. 260B.171 and Minn. Stat. Sec. 245A there are exceptions even for misdemeanors. A court may always unseal a juvenile record and juvenile records are automatically accessible to licensing agencies such as the Department of Human Services. A juvenile record may preclude an adult from working in the health care field, in a daycare, educational field, foster care or from possessing a firearm. Juvenile records are also always accessible to law enforcement agencies.
School Notification
There are many juvenile offenses that require law enforcement to notify that juvenile’s school officials. School notification must occur when a juvenile is charged (not convicted) of a controlled substance crime including possession, possession with intent to sell or possession of substances with the intent to manufacture methamphetamines, possession of a small amount of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia or possession, consumption or purchase of alcohol.
School notification must also occur if the offense is one where protection of a victim is necessary. That may occur where assault, criminal sexual conduct, terroristic threats, harassment or similar offenses are charged.
.
Sell and Rent Back









































